Legal Opinion
In Re Mahoney
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 9, 1992No. 90-1191PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
Respondent, a member of the bars of New Jersey and the District of Columbia, was issued a public reprimand by the Supreme Court of New Jersey, and ordered to be subject to a one-year proctorship on July 20, 1990, for his neglect of four separate clients during his representation of them in real estate matters over a two year period. The proceeding comes before this court from the Board of Professional Responsibility (the Board) as a reciprocal discipline case. The Board concluded that the violations found by the Supreme Court of New Jersey are equivalent to or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re PeekDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re ReidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re JacobyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re DruryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re ZelloeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re PatelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.