Legal Opinion
In re Patel
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 17, 2007No. 06-BG-1187PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding against respondent, Chirayu A. Patel,1 the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended to this court that a reciprocal but non-identical discipline of a six-month suspension be imposed. No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed.
On March 9, 2005, the Supreme Court of New Jersey reprimanded respondent for violations of New Jersey Rules 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of client trust funds) and 1.1.5(d) (failure to comply with record keeping requirements). Respondent stipulated to the facts, violations, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Glenn H. StephensDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021