Legal Opinion
Five Points Road Joint Venture v. Johanns
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 8, 2008No. 07-3406PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
In April 2005, the Farm Service Agency, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), ordered the plaintiffs (collectively, “Five Points”) to refund certain benefits that they had received from it. Five Points appealed the decision to the National Appeals Division (“NAD”), which reversed the Farm Service Agency’s determination in its entirety. Five Points then applied to the NAD for attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 504 (“EAJA”), but the NAD denied the request on the ground that the EAJA did not apply to NAD…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Marcello v. BondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Forney v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Clancy v. Office of Foreign Assets Control of the United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Dominguez v. Quigley's Irish Pub, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Titan Tire Corp. of Freeport, Inc. v. United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Estate of KarpovCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Gasplus, L.L.C. v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.