Legal Opinion
Forney v. Apfel
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 22, 1998No. 97-5737PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer
The question in this case is whether a Social Security disability claimant seeking court reversal of an agency decision denying benefits may appeal a district court order remanding the case to the agency for further proceedings. We conclude that the law authorizes such an appeal.
I
Sandra K. Forney, the petitioner, applied for Social Security disability benefits under § 228 of the Social Security Act, as added, 70 Stat. 815, and as amended, 42 U. S. C. §423. A Social Security Administration Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) determined (1) that Forney had not worked since the onset of her medical…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Halray Harman v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Leopoldo Leon v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Seavey v. Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Sinkler v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.