Legal Opinion

Melia v. Employment Security Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1956No. Docket 39, Calendar 46,705PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

[dissenting). We must here determine the meaning of an amendment * to the Michigan employment security act. † The plaintiff, Mary E. Melia, sought and obtained an adjustment in her unemployment compensation by virtue of such amendment. Appealing the order of the circuit court is her employer, Universal Products Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Joining as amici curiae are the Michigan Employers’ Unemployment Compensation Bureau, Inc., and the Budd Company. Also before us is the Michigan employment security commission, as interested party which, with the appeal board of such commission,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Godsol v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. People v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. McIntireMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Stowers v. WolodzkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Reardon v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re Forfeiture of $5,264Michigan Supreme Court · 1989

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API