Legal Opinion
McCracken v. ConocoPhillips Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 6, 2009No. 09-1800PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Ted McCracken appeals from the District Court’s dismissal of his civil complaint. For the reasons that follow, we will summarily affirm.
In June 2007, McCracken filed a complaint alleging that the named defendants were responsible for his thyroid cancer. Defendant Goodfellow Corporation moved to dismiss the case for lack of federal jurisdiction. After giving McCracken numerous opportunities to file amended complaints, the District Court dismissed for McCracken’s failure to plead a basis for federal jurisdiction. On September 25, 2008, McCracken filed a motion for reconsideration, which…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- George S. Krasnov v. Brendan DinanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Ahmed v. DragovichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Midlantic National Bank v. E.F. Hansen, Jr. G. Eileen Hansen Hansen Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Frett-Smith v. VanterpoolCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Stanley BaptisteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
4Cited by12 opinions
- AIKENS v. CIRCLE KDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- CARTER v. LA Z BOY CORPORATIONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- COLES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (USDOT)District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Derek Bell v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- EAVES v. BENSON LINCOLN MERCURY, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.