Legal Opinion

AIKENS v. CIRCLE K

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00643Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LASHAWNNA AIKENS, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 21-643 ) Judge Nora Barry Fischer CIRCLE K, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of May 2021, upon consideration of the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by pro se Plaintiff Lashawnna Aikens, (Docket Nos. [1]), and the accompanying Complaint, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said Motion [1] is GRANTED as to the In Forma Pauperis Status of pro se Plaintiff Lashawnna Aikens ONLY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above captioned matter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API