Legal Opinion
George S. Krasnov v. Brendan Dinan
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 7, 1972No. 72-1337PublishedCited by 375 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires us to decide whether plaintiffs sustained the burden of proving diversity of citizenship of the parties in order to confer federal jurisdiction. Specific to our inquiry is a review of the district court’s finding that because defendant intended to remain at his Pennsylvania residence indefinitely, he must be considered a citizen of that state, 333 F.Supp. 751, 339 F.Supp. 1357.
After the jurisdictional allegation was traversed, the district court considered evidence produced both by depositions, Tanzymore v. Bethlehem Steel…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Minor v. HappersettSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Williamson v. OsentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- District of Columbia v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by375 opinions
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Washington v. HOVENSA LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Giles v. KearneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Walton v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
370 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.