Legal Opinion

Derek Bell v. Pfizer, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 2026No. 2:26-cv-02979Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DEREK BELL, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 26-CV-2979 : PFIZER, INC., : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM PADOVA, J. AUGUST 13 , 2026 On May 1, 2026, Derek Bell submitted a pro se Complaint against Pfizer, Inc. (Pfizer) and filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) After his Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis was denied for lack of sufficient information (ECF No. 5), Bell submitted new applications for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (See ECF Nos. 6, 8.) He also filed an Amended Complaint…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API