Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Rothman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 11, 1997PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 23, 1996, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a salesperson when his employer discovered that he had violated the company policy forbidding employees from taking home company materials, such as catalogs and price lists. Claimant acknowledged that he was aware of this policy but that he nonetheless took company materials home and later destroyed some of them…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ImondiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of NaymarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KaissarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of NaraineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of CrearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re the Claim of GibsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. In re the Claim of BlaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API