Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Gibson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 31, 1996, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Following a dispute with a client, claimant, a security receptionist, was informed by her supervisor on July 15, 1994 *907that she was being taken off this assignment and directed to report to work the following week for a new one. On the morning of July 18, 1994, however, claimant personally contacted the former client to discuss the loss of her assignment.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RothmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of NaraineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GuibertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of SantanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of CeleiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re the Claim of LazarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. In re the Claim of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API