In re the Claim of Naymark

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 5, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Discharged from his position as a paint mixer for a commercial printing firm, claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits was denied by the Board on the ground that he was terminated for misconduct. We reject claimant’s contention that this determination is not supported by substantial evidence.

The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing…