Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Kaissar
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 29, 2004PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*830Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 19, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the UnemploymehifTnsurance Appeal Board finding that claimant lost her employment as a staff accountant due to disqualifying misconduct. The record establishes that claimant removed documents from work, although aware of the company policy that documents not be removed without permission. She then refused the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of RothmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of ArbatoskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re the Claim of SpencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of OchsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re GhoulianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of PearlsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of RowenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.