Legal Opinion
Pratt v. Chicago Housing Authority
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 7, 1994No. 93 C 6985PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER
ANDERSEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Mark Pratt, Easter Redman, Ethel Washington and Barbara Moore have brought this action on behalf of all tenants and lawful residents of property owned and operated by defendant Chicago Housing Authority (“CHA”). Plaintiffs’ complaint is a civil rights action for déclaratory and injunc-tive relief arising under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1988, and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, et seq., due to defendant’s alleged violations of the tenants’ rights guaranteed by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Marvin BerkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Charles Reardon and Gregory Heinzel v. Gary Wroan, Ralph Ebert and Steve PloenseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Randy Ray Howard, United States of America v. Robert Leroy AngelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Melvin Wade v. Oscar Byles and T Force Security, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Juan Benet JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Black v. Village of Park ForestDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Easyriders Freedom F.I.G.H.T. v. HanniganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995
- Wade v. BylesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.