Legal Opinion

United States v. Juan Benet Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 12, 1999No. 97-2021, 97-2414PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

When the people of the United States decided to include the Fourth Amendment in the Bill of Rights, they did so for a reason. They wanted to place constraints on the power of the police to conduct searches and seizures based on no more than a general warrant, because they knew that such unchecked power could lead to serious abuses. Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 583, 100 S.Ct. 1371, 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980) (“[Indiscriminate searches and seizures conducted under the authority of ‘general warrants’ were the immediate evils that motivated the framing and adoption of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Shaun J. Matz v. Rodney KlotkaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  3. United States v. Peter John CormierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Clarence Richardson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Kelly Donald GouldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API