Legal Opinion

Charles Reardon and Gregory Heinzel v. Gary Wroan, Ralph Ebert and Steve Ploense

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 29, 1987No. 86-2141PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants, Charles Reardon and Gregory Heinzel, challenge the grant of summary judgment denying them relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for the warrantless entry of their residence. For the reasons stated below, we reverse in part and remand.

I

About 6:45 p.m. on December 18, 1983, defendant officers Gary Wroan, Ralph Ebert and Steve Ploense of the Normal, Illinois police force received a radio report of a burglary in progress at 608 Broadway in Normal. They knew that the address was of an Illinois State University fraternity house and that the university students were on Christmas break. 1…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Harold B. Dorman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Hancock v. DodsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. William Hawkins v. Rodney MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Greiner v. City of ChamplinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. Michael Schertz and Beverly Schertz v. Waupaca CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. William J. Klein v. Lawrence Ryan and Frank LombardoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API