Legal Opinion
Easyriders Freedom F.I.G.H.T. v. Hannigan
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 25, 1995No. 93-0807-J (CM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS ON REQUEST FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION; ISSUING PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
JONES, District Judge.
This case is before the court on a motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ request that the court issue a permanent injunction against officials of the California Highway Patrol (CHP). Plaintiffs are motorcyclists who have been issued citations under the California Mandatory Motorcycle Helmet Law, California Vehicle Code § 27803, for wearing helmets that were alleged not to comply with federal safety standards. Plaintiffs ask the court to enjoin…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Allee v. MedranoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Charles Laduke v. Alan C. Nelson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Easyriders Freedom F.I.G.H.T. v. HanniganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- City of Bremerton v. SpearsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Bremerton v. SpearsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6111, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,011 Easyriders Freedom F.I.G.H.T., an Unincorporated Association of Motorcyclists v. Maurice Hannigan, as Commissioner of the California Highway Patrol, Easyriders Freedom F.I.G.H.T., an Unincorporated Association of Motorcyclists v. Maurice Hannigan, as Commissioner of the California Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996