Arizona v. Hicks
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
In Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443 (1971), we said that in certain circumstances a warrantless seizure by police of an item that comes within plain view during their lawful search of a private area may be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. See id., at 465-471 (plurality opinion); id., at 505-506 (Black, J., concurring and dissenting); id., at 521-522 (White, J., concurring and dissenting). We granted certiorari, 475 U. S. 1107 (1986), in the present case to decide whether this “plain view” doctrine may be invoked when the police have less than probable cause to believe that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,349 opinions
- Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
1,344 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.