Legal Opinion
DeBrincat v. Mogan
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 1934No. Civ. 9547PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
This is an original proceeding in mandamus. The petitioner and one Whitfield, both residents of the city and county of San Francisco, were involved in a collision in San Mateo County from which both claimed damages. On February 9, 1934, a complaint was filed by Whitfield in the Superior Court of San Francisco seeking damages from petitioner. On February 13, 1934, petitioner filed a complaint in the Superior Court in San Mateo County seeking damages from Whitfield. Summons was served in the latter case on the same day. In the former case summons was served on February 17th. Thereafter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Gardiner v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Williams v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Fawkes v. City of BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Gorman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Myers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People Ex Rel. Garamendi v. American Autoplan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Ault v. Council of City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.