Legal Opinion

Grow v. Marwick Development, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1980No. 16675PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINSON, District Judge:

Appellant appeals from a summary judgment which declared that the respondents had not forfeited their interest under a uniform real estate contract.

The basic facts which are applicable in this case and do not appear to be in dispute are as follows:

1.That on the 18th day of October, 1977, the appellant David S. Grow as seller and respondents Marwick Development, Inc., a corporation; Daniel R. Southwick and Sterling Martell jointly and severally as buyers entered into a uniform real estate contract for the purchase of certain real property located in Utah County, State…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holbrook Company v. AdamsUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Controlled Receivables, Inc. v. HarmanUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Leone v. ZunigaUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Hansen v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Russell v. Park City Utah CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Plateau Mining Co. v. Utah Division of State Lands & ForestryUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Faulkner v. FarnsworthUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. R & R Energies v. Mother Earth Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Messick v. PHD Trucking Service, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API