Grow v. Marwick Development, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINSON, District Judge:
Appellant appeals from a summary judgment which declared that the respondents had not forfeited their interest under a uniform real estate contract.
The basic facts which are applicable in this case and do not appear to be in dispute are as follows:
1.That on the 18th day of October, 1977, the appellant David S. Grow as seller and respondents Marwick Development, Inc., a corporation; Daniel R. Southwick and Sterling Martell jointly and severally as buyers entered into a uniform real estate contract for the purchase of certain real property located in Utah County, State…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holbrook Company v. AdamsUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- Controlled Receivables, Inc. v. HarmanUtah Supreme Court · 1966
- Leone v. ZunigaUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- Hansen v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1976
- Russell v. Park City Utah CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- Plateau Mining Co. v. Utah Division of State Lands & ForestryUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Faulkner v. FarnsworthUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- R & R Energies v. Mother Earth Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
- Messick v. PHD Trucking Service, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.