Messick v. PHD Trucking Service, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Chief Justice:
This case has previously been on appeal to this Court. Plaintiff originated the action as the lessor under a truck leasing agreement to compel defendant/lessee to account for payments allegedly due and owing. The pertinent facts that precipitated the cause of action are as set forth in our initial opinion:
Perry Messick, plaintiff, bought a truck from Veri Davies and Ray Hiatt in their individual capacities on December 7, 1963, for $10,000. Messick paid $2,000 down and gave a note for the balance to Davies and Hiatt. Davies and Hiatt are the owners and principal officers of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Roepke v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Norman v. Murray First Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jones & Trevor Marketing, Inc. v. LowryUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Cascade Energy & Metals Corp. v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Salt Lake City Corp. v. James Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- Transamerica Cash Reserve, Inc. v. Dixie Power & Water, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- M.J. v. WisanUtah Supreme Court · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.