Legal Opinion

Messick v. PHD Trucking Service, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1984No. 18569PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

This case has previously been on appeal to this Court. Plaintiff originated the action as the lessor under a truck leasing agreement to compel defendant/lessee to account for payments allegedly due and owing. The pertinent facts that precipitated the cause of action are as set forth in our initial opinion:

Perry Messick, plaintiff, bought a truck from Veri Davies and Ray Hiatt in their individual capacities on December 7, 1963, for $10,000. Messick paid $2,000 down and gave a note for the balance to Davies and Hiatt. Davies and Hiatt are the owners and principal officers of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Roepke v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Norman v. Murray First Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jones & Trevor Marketing, Inc. v. LowryUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Cascade Energy & Metals Corp. v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. Salt Lake City Corp. v. James Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Transamerica Cash Reserve, Inc. v. Dixie Power & Water, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. M.J. v. WisanUtah Supreme Court · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API