Legal Opinion

Holbrook Company v. Adams

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1975No. 14005PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff Holbrook Company sued the three named defendants, alleging they were a partnership dba The Exchange, for the value of work and materials furnished in remodeling the building at 39 Exchange Place in Salt Lake City: one count is in quantum meruit and one is for failure to file the bond required by Section 14-2-1, U.C.A.1953, to protect those furnishing such services. Defendants do not question that those causes of action are sufficiently stated. They filed a verified motion to dismiss, asserting therein that they were not a partnership; and that neither as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tanner v. Utah Poultry & Farmers CooperativeUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Hill Ex Rel. Fogel v. Grand Central, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Archuleta v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Anderson Development Co. v. TobiasUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kilpatrick v. Wiley, Rein & FieldingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  4. Rees v. Albertson's, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Draper City v. Estate of BernardoUtah Supreme Court · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API