Controlled Receivables, Inc. v. Harman
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CALLISTER, Justice.
Plaintiff, Claude D. Harman, and his successors in interest, Controlled Receivables, Inc., initiated this action to quiet title to a parcel of land situated in Salt Lake County and to have certain deeds, under which defendants claimed an interest as *422joint tenants, set aside and declared null and void. In essence, plaintiff, Claude, based the invalidity of the deeds on the ground that there was no delivery or that the deeds were intended to take effect only upon his death and were therefore an invalid attempt to make a testamentary disposition of his property. The trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Samms v. EcclesUtah Supreme Court · 1961
- Halleck v. HALLECKOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Northcrest, Inc. v. WALKER BANK & TRUST CO.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
- Chamberlain Etl Al. v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- Herr v. HerrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Atkin, Wright & Miles, CharteredUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Baker v. PatteeUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Grow v. Marwick Development, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
- Foster v. SteedUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- W. M. Barnes Co. v. Sohio Natural Resources Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.