Advamtel, LLC v. at & T Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
Sixteen competitive local exchange carriers (“CLECs”) 1 bring this severed action 2 against AT & T Corporation (“AT & T”) to collect fees allegedly owed to them pursuant to a published tariff. AT & T contends it has no obligation to pay the fees because the tariff rate is unreasonable and because AT & T never ordered the ser vices or agreed to pay the tariff rates. As a result of a threshold motion, the parties’ dispute concerning the reasonableness of the published tariff rates has been referred to the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”). See…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- At&T Communications of the Midwest, Inc. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- North County Communications Corp. v. Verizon Global Networks, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Sancom, Inc. v. Qwest Communications Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2009
- Alliance Communications Cooperative, Inc. v. Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2009
- Freedom Ring Communications, LLC v. AT & T CORP.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.