Legal Opinion
Freedom Ring Communications, LLC v. AT & T CORP.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided October 18, 2002No. CIV. 02-248PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BARBADORO, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, Freedom Ring Communications LLC, d/b/a BayRing Communications (“BayRing”), filed suit against the defendant, AT & T Corporation (“AT & T”). BayRing seeks to collect fees (Count I) for telecommunications services allegedly provided to AT & T pursuant to tariffs filed with the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) and the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (“PUC”). BayRing also seeks relief under state common law for unjust enrichment (Count II).
AT & T moves to dismiss Count II, arguing that it is barred by the filed rate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Langadinos v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Martin v. Applied Cellular Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Suzanne Cahnmann, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Sprint CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Advamtel, LLC v. at & T Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sancom, Inc. v. Qwest Communications Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2009
- All Am. Tel. Co. v. AT & T Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Aventure Communications Technology, LLC v. Sprint Communications Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2015
- Qwest Communications Co. v. Aventure Communications Technology, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2015
- AT&T Corp. v. Aventure Communication Technology, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.