North County Communications Corp. v. Verizon Global Networks, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM
ROGER T. BENITEZ, District Judge.
Before this Court is Plaintiff North County Communications Corporation’s (“North County’s”) Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) the First Amended Counter claim by Defendants Verizon Global Networks, Inc., MCI Communications Services, Inc., dba Verizon Business, and MCIMetro Access Transmission Services LLC (collectively, “Verizon”). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART.
BACKGROUND
Switched access charges are charges incurred…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- (CONSENT) A.B. Concrete Coating Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PS)Murphy v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Ahamed v. Navy Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Flores v. Missouri Higher Education AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc v. US Freedom Flyers, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.