Legal Opinion

North County Communications Corp. v. Verizon Global Networks, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 9, 2010No. 3:08-cr-01518PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM

ROGER T. BENITEZ, District Judge.

Before this Court is Plaintiff North County Communications Corporation’s (“North County’s”) Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) the First Amended Counter claim by Defendants Verizon Global Networks, Inc., MCI Communications Services, Inc., dba Verizon Business, and MCIMetro Access Transmission Services LLC (collectively, “Verizon”). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART.

BACKGROUND

Switched access charges are charges incurred…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. (CONSENT) A.B. Concrete Coating Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. (PS)Murphy v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. Ahamed v. Navy Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
  4. Flores v. Missouri Higher Education AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc v. US Freedom Flyers, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API