Maganini v. Hodgson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
This is a suit by the owners of two lots to restrain the claimed violation of common restrictions by a third lot owner in the same tract. Judgment was for the plaintiffs Maloney against the defendant and for the defendant against the named plaintiff. The losing parties have appealed. Such dispute as exists with reference to the facts does not go to the vitals of the case. The real complaint of the appellants is that the facts found do not support tire conclusions reached. No material change can be made in the finding.
On March 20, 1913, a developer received a deed to a tract of land in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Bacon v. SandbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Lyman v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Hammerberg v. LeinertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Allis v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Moore v. SerafinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Pulver v. MascoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Grady v. SchmitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Rodgers Et Ux v. Reimann Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Shields v. Welshire Development Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.