Legal Opinion
Pulver v. Mascolo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 19, 1967PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
In this action, the plaintiffs seek an injunction to restrain the defendants from constructing on the defendants’ property a small outbuilding to contain the filtering equipment for a swimming pool, bathhouse facilities and toilet facilities in violation of a restrictive covenant. The case was submitted on a stipulation of facts. The trial court rendered judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiffs have appealed to us.
In the late 1940’s, and into the 1950’s, The Berner Lohne Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the company, owned a certain tract of land in the town of Orange known as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Easterbrook v. Hebrew Ladies Orphan SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Town of Stamford v. VuonoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Hooker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Neptune Park Assn. v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Baker v. LundeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Moore v. SerafinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Contegni v. PayneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Gilbert v. Beaver Dam Ass'n of Stratford, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Genovese Drug Stores, Inc. v. Connecticut Packing Company, Inc., and Fotomat CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Castonguay v. PlourdeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.