Rodgers Et Ux v. Reimann Et Ux
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is a suit in equity to enforce a building restriction contained in a land sale contract under which defendants were purchasers of a lot in the city of Salem, Oregon.
Defendants own the restricted lot, hereafter referred to as Lot 11, which abuts Kingwood drive on the east. The lot owned by plaintiffs 'abuts Kingwood drive on the west, directly across the street from Lot 11. Plaintiffs purchased their lot from Dr. and Mrs. Lebold on January 31, 1957. We shall refer to plaintiffs’ parcel as the Lebold lot. At the time plaintiffs purchased the Lebold lot, Mr. and Mrs. Willett owned the lot…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Tallmadge v. . the East River BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Snow v. Van DamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Turner v. BrocatoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Swaggerty v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Garza v. GraysonOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Thomas v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Aldridge v. SaxeyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.