Legal Opinion

Brown v. Gow

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1933No. Docket No. 660PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

This action was originally instituted by plaintiff against J. R. Brightman to recover a balance of $3,060.50 alleged to be due for services performed by plaintiff at Brightman’s request. During the pendency of the action and prior to trial, J. R. Brightman died and the executrix of his will was substituted as the defendant in his place. The trial resulted in the rendition of a judgment in defendant’s favor from which judgment plaintiff has prosecuted this appeal.

Appellant’s supplemental complaint filed subsequent to Brightman’s death contains four counts. In the first count the sum demanded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co. v. S. S. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Colburn v. ParrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Tipps v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Light v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eleanor M. Willhoit and John D. Willhoit v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. K & L Litho Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Hausen v. GoldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Tabata v. MuraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API