Legal Opinion

Hausen v. Goldman

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1954No. Civ. 4672PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

This is an action to determine the ownership of a one-third of 1 per cent royalty interest in certain oil land in Kern County. Plaintiff claims 50 per cent of said interest by reason of a partnership or joint venture agreement entered into with defendant in the latter part of 1943. Defendant denied that there was a joint venture between the parties and denied that plaintiff had an interest in said royalty or in the money which defendant had received or was to receive from it in the future.

The trial court found that the interest involved was not created as a result of the agreement of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Sublett v. Henry's Turk & Taylor LunchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Ayoob v. AyoobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Brown v. GowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. White v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dugar v. Happy Tiger Records, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Guardianship of LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Arch Sellery, Inc. v. SimpsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Estate of BourquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Moore v. Tristar Oil and Gas Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API