Legal Opinion
Roth v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1953No. L. A. 22278PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Irwin Harry Roth was disbarred in 1942 upon conviction of a felony. (Bar Misc. No. 1745.) In 1950, he petitioned for reinstatement. An administrative committee of The State Bar unanimously recommended that his petition for reinstatement be denied. The matter is before this court upon Roth’s petition to review the order of the Board of Governors upholding that determination. (Rules on Original Proceedings in Reviewing Courts, rule 59[b].)
Roth first was admitted to practice in Missouri. In 1931, following three years of practice in Missouri, he was admitted to the California bar…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kepler v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Feinstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re LaceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- In Re AndreaniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Wettlin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Maria Garcia-Gonzales v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Kennick v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Tardiff v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Goff v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Hippard v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.