Legal Opinion
In Re Lacey
California Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1938No. S. F. 15929PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Application of Joseph P. Lacey for readmission to practice law in this state after his disbarment by this court on the ground of his conviction of a felony involving moral turpitude. The application for reinstatement is based upon the ground and claim that the applicant since his disbarment has rehabilitated himself and now possesses the necessary moral qualifications and mental attainments to entitle him to be restored as a member of the Bar and to practice as an attorney in all the courts of this state. *700The application was made in the first instance to the Board of Governors of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Fish v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Vaughan v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re McKelveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by28 opinions
- Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Jerry D. Chaney v. The State Bar of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- In Re Rose VCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.