Legal Opinion
Rigopoulos v. Kervan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 29, 1942PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs move to strike from the answer two affirmative defenses upon the ground that they fail to allege facts sufficient to constitute defenses to this action.
This is an action under § 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S. C.A. §§ 201-219, to recover unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages for failure to pay such wages and reasonable attorneys fees. The defendant denies that the plaintiffs were employed in excess of the hours prescribed in the statute or that any overtime wages or liquidated damages are due them.
An attempt is made in the two…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Missel v. Overnight Motor Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Travis v. RayDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- Fleming v. Warshawsky & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Thompson v. DaughertyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1941
- Emerson v. Mary Lincoln Candies, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Richard Runyan v. National Cash Register Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Guess v. MontagueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Rigopoulos v. KervanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Bailey v. Karolyna Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.