Legal Opinion
Rigopoulos v. Kervan
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 15, 1943No. 68PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an action under section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b), brought against the defendant, who does interstate business under the name and style of The Kervan Company, by ten of his employees. Each plaintiff has recovered judgment in a specified amount, and they have jointly been awarded costs and disbursements which include a fee of $200 for their attorney. Section 16(b), upon which the action is predicated, declares that an employer who violates the provisions of section 6 or section 7 (that is, who fails to pay the minimum wage rates…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Guess v. MontagueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Fleming v. Warshawsky & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Seneca Coal & Coke Co. v. LoftonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- American Can Co. v. Ladoga Canning Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Nakahata v. New York-Presbyterian Healthcare System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Klinghoffer Bros. Realty Corp., Irving Jacobson and Albert KlinghofferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Biggs v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.