Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Karolyna Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 10, 1943PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves, under Rule 12(b) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to strike out the several affirmative defenses and counterclaim pleaded in defendants’ answer.
This is, in reality, a motion to dismiss, and will be so considered.
The action was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219, on the plaintiff’s own behalf and on behalf of all other similarly situated, to recover unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages and reasonable counsel fees.
Defendants deny that any sum is due to plaintiff, and in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. HargraveCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Curtis v. . AlbeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Donahue v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Berry v. 34 Irving Place CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Greenberg v. Arsenal Bldg. CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Walsh v. 515 Madison Avenue Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.