Emerson v. Mary Lincoln Candies, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.
The suit is to recover $2,456.74, being twice the amount which plaintiff claims is his overtime wages under the Federal “ Fair Labor Standards Act ” (U. S. Code, tit. 29, chap. 8, §§ 201-219), which act, in paragraph (b) of section 216, makes the employer who fails to pay the mandated overtime compensation liable for the amount thereof, plus an additional equal amount “ as liquidated damages,” plus an attorney’s fee. The answer, besides denials, contains six alleged separate defenses as against each of which plaintiff moves, asserting each is insufficient in law.
First defense is to the effect…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Collie v. FergussonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Cox v. . Lykes BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
3Cited by21 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lapinski v. CopacinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Adair v. the Traco DivisionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Zwang v. A. & P. Food StoresAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
- Rigopoulos v. KervanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.