Legal Opinion

Dixon Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Walters

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1975No. Civ. 14434PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EVANS, J.

Plaintiff and cross-defendant (hereafter appellant) appeals from an adverse judgment in favor of defendant and cross-complainant (hereafter respondent). The trial of the action was bifurcated; the court without a jury considered the question of whether to apply Nevada or California law, and a jury thereafter heard evidence and rendered a verdict on appellant’s complaint for recovery of personal property and damages and respondent’s cross-complaint seeking rescission, restitution, and compensatory and exemplary damages. The trial court ruled that California law, specifically…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Kasel v. Remington Arms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Aaron Senne v. Kansas City Royals BaseballCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Arno v. Club Med Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Application Group, Inc. v. Hunter Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Myra Strassberg v. New England Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API