Legal Opinion
Arno v. Club Med Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1994No. 92-16026PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge KOZINSKI; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge.
Carolyn Amo alleges she was raped by her boss while employed as a gentile organisat-eure (G.O.) or hostess, at the Club Med *1467resort in Guadeloupe, France.1 Based on this incident, she raises a variety of tort and contract claims, as well as a claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We consider which of these claims she may maintain and — as a preliminary matter — what law applies.
I. Facts
After vacationing at a Club Med resort, Arno decided to apply for a G.O. position.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Susan Waltman v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Dole Food Co. v. WattsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Shekoyan v. Sibley International Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Dole Food Company, Inc. v. WattsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Isuzu Motors Ltd. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Luis Mujica v. Airscan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.