Karst v. Seller
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County changing the place of trial. Pat R Parker, Judge Presiding. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order changing the place of trial of this action from the county of Los Angeles to the city and county of San Francisco.
The order was made on the application of the defendant Seller on the grounds that he is a resident, of San Francisco, that no cause of action exists in favor of plaintiff against the other defendant, J. E. Armstrong, and that the attempt to state a cause of action against said Armstrong was fraudulent and for the sole purpose of having the action tried in Los Angeles County, where said plaintiff and the defendant Armstrong reside.
The complaint is on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rogers v. McCord-collins Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Smith v. . ZalinskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Truesdale v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- McDonald v. California Timber Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Reilly v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fitzhugh v. University of Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Rilcoff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. Spring Valley Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- California Collection Agency, Inc. v. FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Plum v. Forgay Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.