Falk v. Schuster
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
The plaintiffs, heirs-at-law of David R. Pogolofsky, deceased, appealed to the Superior Court from the admission of the decedent’s will to probate. The will provided that the entire estate was to pass to Ida Schuster and her husband, the defendant Bernard B. Schuster, one of the owners of Schuster’s Express which employed the testator for a period of twenty-six years prior to his death. The plaintiffs claimed that the testator lacked sufficient testamentary capacity to execute the will, and that the will was the product of undue influence exerted upon the testator by the defendant. A jury…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meglio v. ComeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Berkeley v. BerkeleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Keeler v. General Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Maroncelli v. StarkweatherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Smith v. Waterbury & Milldale Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tomczuk v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Pagano v. IppolitiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Gaulton v. Reno Paint & Wallpaper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Barra v. Ridgefield Card & Gift Gallery, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Magnon v. GlickmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.