Legal Opinion
Gaulton v. Reno Paint & Wallpaper Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 20, 1979PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
In September of 1971, the plaintiffs, Gregory Gaulton, ppa, and Elizabeth and Peter Gaulton, his parents, filed suit against the Reno Paint and Wallpaper Company and the O’Brien Paint Corporation, seeking to recover damages for injuries allegedly caused to the minor plaintiff, in útero, as the result of the use by the plaintiff mother of interior latex paint manufactured by the O’Brien Paint Corporation. A substituted complaint, dated October 5,1977, contained four counts: strict liability in tort; breach of warranty; negligence ; and recovery for the medical expenses incurred by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lydia Basko v. Sterling Drug, Inc., and Winthrop LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Meglio v. ComeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Freedman v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Slepski v. Williams Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- The American Oil Company v. John H. HartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. CorchadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Blanchette v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.