Legal Opinion

Magnon v. Glickman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 11, 1981PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbthtjb H. Healey, J.

This is an action for personal injuries arising from a fall which occurred on December 29, 1972, in the corridor of the defendants’ building located in Stamford. The plaintiff alleged that she fell because the corridor floor was slippery and/or covered with a sticky substance, which condition, she claimed, was due to the negligence of the defendants. After a trial to the jury, a verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff. Upon the denial of their motion to set aside the verdict and their motion for judgment, 1 the defendants have appealed. 2

The jury could have reasonably found the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Vandersluis v. WeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. Ziman v. WhitleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Amato v. DesentiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. State v. BausmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Holbrook v. CasazzaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Herb v. KerrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. State v. UsrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Alpha Crane Service, Inc. v. Capitol Crane Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API