Smith v. Waterbury & Milldale Tramway Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.
The defendant in its demurrer claimed that the real party in interest was the Travelers Insurance Company, by virtue of an assignment of plantiff’s claim in this action and of subrogation to the plaintiff’s rights. The point is not well taken. General Statutes, § 5655, provides that the “equitable and bona fide owner of any chose in action, not negotiable, may sue thereon in his own name.” But he is not obliged to do so, the statute is merely permissive. The right of the assignor to sue in his own name, as at common law, still exists. Furthermore, the assignee can, as at common law, if he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morse v. Consolidated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Banks v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Hawkins v. Garford Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Fuller v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Bennett v. LathropSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Torrington Creamery, Inc. v. DavenportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Elk Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Jacobson v. RobingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Rode v. Adley Express Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Keeler v. General Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.