United States v. Grinnell Corp.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, Chief Judge.
In this civil antitrust action brought by the United States against Grinnell Corporation, American District Telegraph Company, Holmes Electric Protective Company and Automatic Fire Alarm Company of Delaware, argument has been heard upon the following, which have been extensively briefed:
I. the government’s motion for the production of documents,
II. the defendants’ objections to the government’s interrogatories,
III. the government’s objections to the defendants’ interrogatories, and
IV. the defendants’ motions for further answers to interrogatories.
I. GOVERNMENT’S MOTION…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aktiebolaget Vargos v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
- United States v. United States Alkali Export Ass'n, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- United States v. Continental Can Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948
- United States v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of LexingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. San Antonio Portland Cement Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1963
- United States v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1966
- Industrial Commission v. HolohanArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- United States v. Capitol Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1981
- Uinta Oil Refining Company v. Continental Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.