Legal Opinion

Uinta Oil Refining Company v. Continental Oil Company

District Court, D. Utah

Decided February 12, 1964No. C 5-62PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.

Presented for decision upon submitted discovery objections in this antitrust suit 1 are peripheral problems under the “work product doctrine” applied by the Supreme Court in Hickman v. Taylor, 2 as well as the extent and depth to which defendants should be allowed pre-trial access through Rule 33 interrogatories 3 to relevant information within the possession or control of the opposing parties, the questions of burdensomeness, privilege and work product aside. Pervasively shadowing these inquiries is the common experience of mankind that at some inconstant point,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Aktiebolaget Vargos v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
  4. Newell v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  5. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. B. A. C. Steel Products, Inc., a Corporation, and W. N. BosticCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Admiral Heating & Ventilating, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  2. Roberson v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969
  3. Massachusetts v. First National Supermarkets, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
  4. Besly-Welles Corp. v. Balax, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968
  5. American Floral Services, Inc. v. Florists' Transworld Delivery Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API