Legal Opinion
United States v. United States Alkali Export Ass'n, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 7, 1946No. Civ. 24-464PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, for an order requiring 11 named defendants to produce and to permit plaintiff to inspect and to copy certain documents.
The complaint charges violations of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin agreements and combinations alleged to be in restraint of trade. The products covered by the complaint are generally referred to as alkalis.
The main ground for opposing the motion is the claim that plaintiff has failed to comply with Rule…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Consolidated Rendering Co. v. VermontSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- June v. George C. Peterson Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Kingsway Press v. Farrell Pub. CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- United States v. American Optical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Monier v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Durkin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
- Dean v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. ShieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Houdry Process Corp. v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.