Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Capitol Service, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 23, 1981No. 80-C-407PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WARREN, District Judge.

Plaintiff United States and defendant United Artists Theatre Circuit (UATC) have filed cross motions to compel production of documents and answers to interrogatories. UATC in its motion seeks four different types of information. Document requests 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 seek all information, documents and transcripts obtained during the pre-complaint investigation carried on by the antitrust division of the Department of Justice as well as information regarding splits in other cities obtained by the plaintiff from distributors, distributors trade groups…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Von BulowSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  2. City of Colorado Springs v. WhiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Fischer v. McGowanDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
  4. United States v. Capitol Service, Inc., Kohlberg Theatres Service Corporation, Marcus Theatres Corporation and United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. General Cinema Corp. v. Buena Vista Distribution Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API