Legal Opinion
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1934No. Civ. 8032PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, J., pro tem.
These appeals are, by stipulation, brought before us on a single bill of exceptions. They embrace five separate actions which were in the court below, by stipulation, consolidated for the purpose of trial.
Although there are two several plaintiffs and four several defendants, the facts and the issues raised, with certain exceptions hereinafter specifically noted, are such that the cases may be treated' as if there were but one action. The several and collective actions will therefore, except when otherwise necessary, be referred to in the singular, such designation, for the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Shipman v. Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Henry v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Jordan Marsh Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Home Indemnity Co. v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Security-First Nat. Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Security First Nat. BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Wright v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Sec.-First Nat'l. Bank of L.A. v. Bank of Am. Nat'l. Tr. & Sav. Ass'n.California Supreme Court · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.