Legal Opinion
Benson v. Andrews
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 1958No. Civ. 23138PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is the second appeal in this ease. The first appeal resulted in a reversal of the judgment because of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings and the judgment. (Benson v. Andrews (1955), 138 Cal. App.2d 123 [292 P.2d 389].)
Benson, a cabinet worker, brought the action in the first instance in 1951 against Angela E. Henry and George A. Henry to foreclose a deed of trust securing a promissory note for $9,000, and against one Kales to foreclose a mechanic’s lien of $3,961. Mark Andrews was a general contractor and the Kales obligation was his. Andrews was the payee of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Franklin v. Nat C. Goldstone AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Meyer v. Glenmoor Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Pace v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- La Mancha Development Corp. v. SheegogCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Wilson v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.